Less may sometimes be more.

Sun, 8 Feb 2009
2 min read
Add Comment

I stay on campus during the weekdays, and when I go back to Hougang on weekends, I try not to use the Internet (or minimise my Internet usage, at least). Call me silly, but I believe it gives me some recharge time and forces me to do some offline reading – I’m finally starting on David Brin’s Glory Season (one year too late, some might say). Until it comes to be seen that this ‘no Internet on weekends’ policy is more bane than boon, I’ll stick to it. Nevertheless, one good thing that has resulted from the policy is in me realising the powers of micro-blogging.

I’ve just started using Twitter, and even more recently, tweet.sg. The latter allows me to send Tweets by texting to a local number, so in essence, I’m micro-blogging while offline. I’ve been wanting to do this for the longest time ever, because of all the thoughts that come to my head while I’m disconnected from the Internet. I’ve never been able to do it, though, due to either the lack of technology available to do so, or my lack of knowledge about the technology available to do so.

More importantly, I’m micro-blogging. Because of the 140 character limit that Twitter imposes, my thoughts are pared down to the bare minimum, so I’m forced to keep everything as succinct as possible. No lengthy discourses, sadly, but in this situation, it’s really the ideas that matter. One of the most important thoughts that came into my head over the weekend was this gem:

While waiting for The Girlfriend, am thinking of how a Writing Fellowship might work to improve standards of literary production in SG.

It was supposed to have been followed up by this:

Alternatively, a Writing Scholarship? Full tuition, yearly stipend, bond free. But recipient must produce literary piece biennially.

but somehow tweet.sg didn’t relay it, for some reason.

Nevertheless, it’s been a good weekend, and a good discovery. Looking forward to more of these weekends – and discoveries – along the way.

Updated wiki + rationale.

Wed, 28 Jan 2009
1 min read
Add Comment

Have updated the Creative Works portion of my wiki, so all are free to go and read/check out the latest works. You’re welcome to muck around inside too – play with the text if it’s there, transfer the text from PDF to the wiki if you want to, create your own works, etc.

The rationale for this is simple:

  1. I’d like to get user feedback as I’m writing. The best way for this is to use a wiki. I know most people haven’t used one before, so don’t worry – I’ll create a simple ‘lesson plan’ soon. (Alternatively, anyone who’s bored can create one for me. Whee for wikis!)
  2. User engagement = business strategy. By involving the audience, I’m (hopefully) engaging them, in the hope that this translates to establishing a solid fan base + customer loyalty. Will this work? It remains to be seen, but I’m hopeful, as you can tell from my repetition of the word in most of its forms.
  3. Last but not least, if mucking around in the dirt results in someone else becoming interested in writing, or at least learning about writing, then it’s one more starfish into the sea, no? 🙂

E-mail Interview with IS Magazine.

Mon, 28 Jul 2008
6 min read
4 Comments

  1. You graduated with a degree in English literature, and you’re also doing a postgraduate diploma in education now. Do you see any parallel in a playwright’s job as compared to a teacher – that of a moral obligation of teaching society at large?

    I don’t think it’s a “moral obligation” to teach society, in the sense that the playwright or teacher is compelled to do so because it is her/his duty. I feel that both the playwright and teacher are well placed to start the ball rolling by discussing issues that are important to a society’s growth and maturity. People in these positions should take up the opportunity to interact with not only young people, but also every individual of society, in fact, with the aim of having everyone grow in knowledge.

    In her novel The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, Muriel Spark points out that everyone already has innate knowledge that education can bring to the fore, when she says: “The word ‘education’ comes from the root e from ex, out, and duco, I lead. It means a leading out. To me education is a leading out of what is already there in the pupil’s soul”. I share similar sentiments, and hope to be able to do the same in the future.

  2. Tell us a bit about your own experience of NS. What about it prompted you to write two plays about NS for the Theatre Festival?

    My Full-time National Service (NSF) was one of the best experiences of my life. I learnt a lot about administration, management, organisation, fitness, etc. while in service, and met some very interesting characters along the way. Nevertheless, I also had my fair share of frustrations such as having to stay back on weekends for duties and ‘burning’ public holidays for extra duties, so there were unhappy moments too.

    I went through the entire spectrum of NSF ranks – I was a Recruit, Private, Corporal, Third Sergeant and Officer Cadet before finally commissioning as a Second Lieutenant. That, coupled with the fact that my various postings to different units required me to constantly utilise different skill sets resulted in a very challenging two and a half years for me. But it also meant that I saw many things that most people would never get a chance to see.

    This alternative perspective has a part to play in why I have chosen to write about NS in Singapore: while I fully understand the importance of NS to Singapore, I have also managed to get a glimpse of the tiresome yet comical aspect of military bureaucracy from various angles, along with the segments of military life that seem really absurd in both the original and the philosophical senses of the word. I feel it necessary to juxtapose these tensions dramatically in order to highlight little known facets of the Singapore military to society at large, as part of my outlook on education and how it should also seek to provide different points of view for and from as many people as possible.

  3. You credit your development as a playwright to Huzir Sulaiman. How did he inspire you to pursue the craft of playwriting?

    Huzir was actually the tutor of two playwriting modules that I took as an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore. I consider myself very lucky that it was him who tutored us and not anyone else – his experience and innate knowledge of the written word meant that he was the best candidate to educate us, and educate us well he did. Not only did he show us much about writing and life that we otherwise would have had to learn by ourselves at a slower pace, he was instrumental in helping us make our mark in the Singapore theatre scene: he organised a staged reading of our plays in May 2007, and invited the crème de la crème of Singapore’s theatrical talents to read for us. That’s how Ivan Heng first noticed Radio Silence, and the rest, as they say, is history. But in terms of continued inspiration, encouragement and support, Huzir has always been and is still there for me, so in all truth, I am only where I am right now because I had the chance to stand on the shoulder of a giant.

  4. Also, tell us a bit more about both Radio Silence and Full Tank!. Can girls, who have never been through NS, catch the jokes going on in the play?

    Of course they can! Women are equally, if not, more responsive to the nuances of text and subtext, so any inability to catch the jokes going on in the play would possibly be a failure on my part as a playwright.

    Radio Silence deals with the issue of communication. One of my personal beliefs is that even though humankind has made so much scientific and technological progress, especially in terms of communications technology, we still lag far behind in terms of basic human communication; we still don’t know how to speak to each other in terms that all of us can understand, because of all the layers of power, rules and rituals we have shrouded ourselves with.

    For Full Tank!, the play deals with the issues of responsibility, governance and power, and asks the question: do the people in charge really know what’s going on, and what are the decisions they make based on, in terms of logic, coherence and relevance to the people they lead?

  5. What do you think are some of the important characteristics a successful playwright should have?

    Humility, love and respect for the people and the world around her/him.

  6. Besides working for your diploma, what else will you be involved in theatre-wise after this?

    Theatre-wise, I intend to publish Radio Silence and Full Tank! together with another military-themed monologue called The Duty later this year. Also, I have something fermenting in a corner of my mind, a play tentatively called Sons and Daughters. It’s a theatrical dystopia that discusses nationhood, leadership and humanity’s never-ending search for a utopian ideal.

    I also plan to embark on a long overdue book project that my sister and I have been discussing for the last five months. It’s tentatively titled Crossroads, and will contain the oral history of our family as told to us by our Indian and Chinese grandparents and their children i.e. our parents and relatives. It will explore the ideas of transnationalism, migration and identity, as we look to find our own answers to what it means to be children of mixed heritage in modern-day Singapore.

  7. How much time did you spend on writing each play until you were satisfied with each?

    Quite a bit! I would say about one year for Radio Silence and six months for Full Tank! I’m still not fully satisfied with either though, but I guess it’s emblematic of life itself: nothing can ever be perfect, so our only human response to this understanding is to keep on tending towards perfection.