Updates on the TAS saga.

  1. My letter to the Sunday Times forum page has been published. Not in its entirety though – the sarcastic bits were toned down – but the message has remained intact. Kudos to the editors for a good job.
  2. Ashiq Idris has also responded to my e-mail. His reply below:

From: Ashiq Idris <ashiq@triathlonsingapore.org>
Date: February 6, 2009 11:37:30 AM GMT+08:00
To: Laremy Lee
Subject: Response to your Email
Reply-To: ashiq@triathlonsingapore.org

Dear Laremy,

I am writing to you in response to your email to the Association dated 2 Feb 2009.  Here I would like to clarify on behalf of the Association that the Association had commissioned an independent Panel of Inquiry to look into the case.  Upon completing their inquiry they have submitted their report to the Association which includes their recommendation on the punishment to be imposed.  The TAS Management Committee agreed to adopt the recommendation and subsequently the two athletes were notified on the decision.

I would also like to clarify that the infringement was “Disobeying instruction of the coach” and the punishment given was imposed on the said infringement.  Disobeying instruction is something the Association see very seriously and for that matter most other National Sports Associations.

I hope I have clarify the reason why they were being punished in contrary to what had been reported in the local media and speculated out of proportion.

I would like to thank you for your comments.

Regards,
Ashiq Idris
AGM

Is the case closed? I don’t know, but I still remain firm on my stand: although rules must be followed, this ‘rule’ in particular is archaic and has no place in our day and age. Also, some points to be clarified:

  • This isn’t about sex, or indecency, by the way, although many people have mistaken it to be so. Please do not be misled. It’s about jurisprudence, I think, but please let me know if I am using the term wrongly.
  • The media did not blow the matter out of proportion. The Straits Times merely reported on the truth, and they did a good job, might I add. The only thing that has been blown out of proportion is the nature and the severity of the punishment – if one is needed at all.
  • I think the above two points merely go to show that Singaporeans need a very good grounding in media literacy, and I’m glad the education system is making an attempt to bridge this gap.

In any case, I hope Dinah and Ying Ren keep on training. It would be nice to see them on the global stage someday, because these are two Singaporeans I’d be very proud to support and cheer my lungs out for.

Don’t fall into the ‘cool tools’ trap.

Stomp out STOMP!

Stomp out STOMP for good!

Positions

  1. We believe STOMP (Straits Times Online Media Print) has more potential for harm than good.
  2. It is an unnecessary tool for surveillance, and has resulted in unnecessary intrusions into the private lives of Singaporeans.
  3. It infantilises Singaporeans, discouraging them from thinking critically about social issues by encouraging vouyeuristic journalism.
  4. STOMP should be shut down for good as it is a detriment toward the proposed establishment of a Renaissance City.
  5. Alternatively, it should be revamped so that it promotes critical thought about the social issues of our day.

The Short of It
Shut Down STOMP!

Why?
Your life or the lives of your loved ones could be the next that is/are affected by STOMP’s current brand of ‘journalism’.

The Long of It
Upon its inception, STOMP was hailed as ‘the next new thing’ in citizen journalism in Singapore – it was expected to be a platform for Singaporeans to create news for Singaporeans, by Singaporeans.

However, it seems that the type of ‘news’ that has been covered thus far ranges from the banal to the mundane, to the downrightly outrageous intrusion of privacy into the lives of Singaporeans.

As a result, the website has resulted in the:

  • encouragement of the culture of voyeurism in our society;
  • inadvertent destruction of the lives of Singaporeans affected by the ‘news’ that STOMP reports on; and the
  • possible infantilising of Singapore society by encouraging only a certain type of journalism from citizens;

among other potentiall detrimental effects.

STOMP could do so much more, namely, encouraging a culture of critical thinking through better journalism, which might result in Singaporeans being better able to engage with the social issues of today. However, it has not and will not until we do something about it.

Join the cause today as we work together to stomp out STOMP, or at the very least, facilitate its reformation into a media website that we can all be proud of.

How We Will Do It

  1. NOW – Raising awareness of the cause through the use of social media and Web 2.0 technology.
  2. NEXT PHASE – Sending appeals or petitions to the people in charge of STOMP until we receive a response from them.

 


 

Further Reading

Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Switch to our mobile site